A003 / Original reflection · Evidence C

Design critique practices reflection

A structured reflection across 4 practical dimensions.

This reflection reviews reported design-critique practices. It is not a design skill, taste, seniority, accessibility certification, usability finding, job performance, hiring, or competence assessment and cannot validate a design or replace research with affected users.✓ Answers stay in memory in this tab. They are not uploaded or saved.

Method card

  • Original project prompts
  • Six prompts per dimension
  • Balanced reverse wording
  • No norms or diagnosis

Rights and evidence

Prompts, labels, scoring, and translations are original to QuizAlbum. Evidence grade C means structured self-reflection, not a validated psychometric instrument.

↗ Terms and interpretation limits
Dimension 1 of 40/24 answered

How much does each statement usually sound like you?

1. Before giving feedback, I ask what the design is trying to accomplish at this stage.
2. I distinguish exploration feedback from a final quality review.
3. I check which audience, context, constraints, and decisions the critique should address.
4. I begin commenting before learning what kind of feedback is useful now.
5. A design should explain itself, so asking about intent feels unnecessary.
6. I can keep the intended outcome visible while still questioning the proposed solution.