R009 / Original reflection · Evidence C

Dating values reflection

A structured reflection across 4 practical dimensions.

This reflection compares dating values. It is not a compatibility, attachment, loyalty, consent, abuse, coercion, sexual-health, or safety assessment and does not recommend starting, escalating, or ending a relationship.✓ Answers stay in memory in this tab. They are not uploaded or saved.

Method card

  • Original project prompts
  • Six prompts per dimension
  • Balanced reverse wording
  • No norms or diagnosis

Rights and evidence

Prompts, labels, scoring, and translations are original to QuizAlbum. Evidence grade C means structured self-reflection, not a validated psychometric instrument.

↗ Terms and interpretation limits
Dimension 1 of 40/24 answered

How much does each statement usually sound like you?

1. I value a dating relationship where both people notice and respond to each other's wellbeing.
2. Small acts of consideration strongly shape whether a connection feels meaningful to me.
3. I want care to move in both directions rather than staying with one giver.
4. Mutual care matters less to me than attraction and shared excitement.
5. I can enjoy dating without expecting much practical or emotional care.
6. How someone responds when I am under strain matters to my sense of connection.